Kimball Tutorial 1                                            Tutorial 2

Content: Using the exact solution of the Schrödinger equation for the ground state of the H atom, derive the Ansatz of G.E.Kimball (für deutsche Leser: die ersten 10 Seiten der Einführung enthalten etwa das gleiche)                                                                                         ES 29 May 2017//2002//1982

K_tutorial1a_1.png

Properties of the H1s wavefunction

H atom, 1s ground state (spatial) wavefunction: Proton at origin, r distance of electron from proton
Exact H1s wavefunction in atomic units! e is the base of the natural logarithms.

K_tutorial1a_2.png

K_tutorial1a_3.png

Graphics:H atom, 1s wavefunction

H atom ground state electron probability density

K_tutorial1a_5.png

Graphics:H atom, 1s 'point' density

H atom ground state probability density summed over all space. Must be 1, meaning: We will find the electron of the atom with certainty somewhere in the universe

K_tutorial1a_7.png

K_tutorial1a_8.png

The same two functions in 3D:

K_tutorial1a_9.png

Graphics:H atom, 1s wavefunction

K_tutorial1a_11.png

Graphics:H atom, 1s 'point' density

This shows the electron density cusp at the location of the proton

Plot of the radial density of the H atom ground state: This is the point density at r multiplied with the volume of an infinitesimal spherical shell K_tutorial1a_13.pngdr, plotted as function of r. Dimension wise, it is the charge in that spherical shell at r. Its maximum is at r = 1 a0, the radius of the 1s orbit of the atom model of Niels Bohr.

K_tutorial1a_14.gif

Graphics:H atom, 1s 'radial' density plotted

The next image is the surface of revolution of the above curve around the r2ψ2-axis
with proton at the origin

K_tutorial1a_16.png

Graphics:H atom, 1s 'radial' density

K_tutorial1a_18.png

K_tutorial1a_19.png

K_tutorial1a_20.gif

H atom, average distance of electron from proton R, bohr units

K_tutorial1a_21.png

K_tutorial1a_22.png

Inside this average distance we find about 58% of the total charge of 1 electron:

K_tutorial1a_23.png

K_tutorial1a_24.png

Energy components:

H atom, potential energy

K_tutorial1a_25.png

K_tutorial1a_26.png

H atom, total potential energy

K_tutorial1a_27.png

K_tutorial1a_28.png

H atom, kinetic energy

K_tutorial1a_29.png

K_tutorial1a_30.png

H atom, total kinetic energy

K_tutorial1a_31.png

K_tutorial1a_32.png

H atom, total Energy

K_tutorial1a_33.png

K_tutorial1a_34.png

H atom, ground state equilibrium energy terms expressed with R, the expectation value of the distance of the electron from the proton

(The next few rows of arithmetic can easily be done by pencil on paper! We let Mathematica do it to make it totally transparent. When you call the notebook with the same name K_tutorial1a2.nb you can check all the calculations online with Mathematica)

K_tutorial1a_35.png

Kimball’s “Ansatz”: Total energy Etot = T+V
T has dimension K_tutorial1a_36.png, V K_tutorial1a_37.png, hence:

K_tutorial1a_38.png

and should be a minimum! Set its derivative to zero to find the optimal R=x:

K_tutorial1a_39.png

K_tutorial1a_40.png

Substitute x for R:

K_tutorial1a_41.png

K_tutorial1a_42.png

We have already determined, that Etot = -1/2 Eh, and R=3/2 a0.
Solve for the constants a,b using these results:

K_tutorial1a_43.png

K_tutorial1a_44.png

Substitute a,b into the “Ansatz” above and obtain Kimball’s equation for the H atom in its stationary ground state:
This is exact! It is a significant mathematical transformation of Schrödinger’s equation for the H-atom ground state, contains the same information and has been misunderstood by all practitioners of a qualitative Kimball or tangent sphere model:

K_tutorial1a_45.png

K_tutorial1a_46.png

Kinetic energy Eh:  Full dimension  K_tutorial1a_47.png

K_tutorial1a_48.png

K_tutorial1a_49.png

Potential energy Eh:

K_tutorial1a_50.png

K_tutorial1a_51.png

Virial Theorem

Check the ratio

K_tutorial1a_52.png

K_tutorial1a_53.png

This should be -2.00... by the Virial Theorem, which is valid in classical and quantum physics. The value -2 of this ratio signifies, that the force maintaining the observed system in a state of equilibrium varies proportional to K_tutorial1a_54.png. It is the electrostatic force between every charged particle pair of the system! If computations of molecules and solid lattices are reasonably complete, they yield Vir of 2.000±0.002. Most texts on quantum chemistry give a proof of this theorem.  

K_tutorial1a_55.png

Note: In this tutorial I have used the qualifier "exact" for the H1s (spatial) wavefunction and the "Kimball equation". Those two expressions are equivalent. They are "exact" in the usual context of quantum chemical computations, but not "absolutely true". We have neglected the finite kinetic energy of the proton (see Tutorial2 and 6), which is ~1/1836 of the kinetic energy of the electron, and have assumed that the proton is a point charge with a size neglectable compared to the "size" of the H-atom. Furthermore, all movements within the atom leave the barycenter fixed. We have neglected relativistic effects, quantum electrodynamic corrections, magnetic interactions between electron and proton spins, and others. They are all of an absolute size 10-5 or less of the values shown.-

Finally, this is the (real valued) amplitude function which goes through zero once during every period of the "wave", i.e. the particle vanishes and reappiers again - addio conservation of mass! This catastrophy is eliminated by the clever mathematics of the complete 1s wavefunction which is complex-valued with a complex timefactor. It is often told, that the "square" of a wavefunction φ at a certain location q (of configuration space) is the probability for finding the particle whose state is φ(q) at q. However, this pertains to the real part of the product φ*(q)φ(q) of two complex conjugate factors. This prevents the particle described by the wavefunction φ(q) to change between death and recreation during every period! I do not know of any textbook with "wave mechanics for the high school" which describes this correctly! It would help to tell this and thus avoid the erroneous notion that quantum mechanical "waves" have macroscopic analogues. Hence, "wave mechanics for the highschool" is a fake: The pupils (perhaps with exceptions, like young Wolfgang Pauli) just do not have the mathematical skill to understand Hermitian operators.

Created with the Wolfram Language